Unfortunately, time and again, the people who are writing these articles condemning the practice don't seem to have ever actually met a debarked dog, much less seen that they are, on the whole, as well-adjusted and capable of expressing themselves as any other. "Debarking" sounds awful on paper (and it's easy to vote to ban, if you're a legislator, but if they'd take a moment to actually learn about the procedure and the life of a debarked (more accurately, bark-softened) dog, they might see that it's not all that bad. Our dogs still bark - they bark at us, the UPS truck, and other dogs. They can hear themselves and each other, but the whole neighborhood can't.
Besides, I am quite sure that the folks who voted for this bill went home afterward and sat down to nice dinners of animals that had actually been killed to suit human whims and desires, and didn't feel much guilt about it. We kill thousands and thousands of animals every day in this country because it's convenient and pleasurable to us, but a minimally-invasive procedure that allows a dog to continue living a fulfilled and happy life is now banned? Seems hypocritical to me.