FDA Alert for Flea/Tick Meds

Ann

Moderator
  • FDA Alerts Pet Owners and Veterinarians About Potential for Neurologic Adverse Events Associated with Certain Flea and Tick Products
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is alerting pet owners and veterinarians to be aware of the potential for neurologic adverse events in dogs and cats when treated with drugs that are in the isoxazoline class.

Since these products have obtained their respective FDA approvals, data received by the agency as part of its routine post-marketing activities indicates that some animals receiving Bravecto, Nexgard or Simparica have experienced adverse events such as muscle tremors, ataxia, and seizures. Another product in this class, Credelio, recently received FDA approval. These products are approved for the treatment and prevention of flea infestations, and the treatment and control of tick infestations.

The FDA is working with manufacturers of isoxazoline products to include new label information to highlight neurologic events because these events were seen consistently across the isoxazoline class of products.

The FDA carefully reviewed studies and other data on Bravecto, Credelio, Nexgard and Simparica prior to approval, and these products continue to be safe and effective for the majority of animals. The agency is asking the manufacturers to make the changes to the product labeling in order to provide veterinarians and pet owners with the information they need to make treatment decisions for each pet on an individual basis. Veterinarians should use their specialized training to review their patients’ medical histories and determine, in consultation with pet owners, whether a product in the isoxazoline class is appropriate for the pet.

Although FDA scientists carefully evaluate an animal drug prior to approval, there is the potential for new information to emerge after marketing, when the product is used in a much larger population. In the first three years after approval, the FDA pays particularly close attention to adverse event reports, looking for any safety information that may emerge.

The FDA monitors adverse drug event reports received from the public or veterinarians, other publicly available information (such a peer-reviewed scientific articles), and mandatory reports from the animal drug sponsor (the company that owns the right to market the drug). Drug sponsors must report serious, unexpected adverse events within 15 days of the event. In addition, they must submit any events that are non-serious, plus any laboratory studies, in vitro studies, and clinical trials that have not been previously submitted to the agency, on a bi-annual basis for the first two years following product approval and annually thereafter.

The FDA continues to monitor adverse drug event reports for these products and encourages pet owners and veterinarians to report adverse drug events. You can do this by reporting to the drugs’ manufacturers, who are required to report this information to the FDA, or by submitting a report directly to the FDA.

To report suspected adverse drug events for these products and/or obtain a copy of the Safety Data Sheet (SDS) or for technical assistance, contact the appropriate manufacturers at the following phone numbers:

Merck Animal Health (Bravecto): 800-224-5318
Elanco Animal Health (Credelio): 888-545-5973
Merial (Nexgard): 888-637-4251
Zoetis (Simparica): 888-963-8471
 
Ann,
Thank you for the article, I have to wrap my head around how some treatments that our Vets have highly recommended for many years may actually be more dangerous than we thought or we told about.
So guess the search for a replacement begins as I have used Nexguard for years based on my Vets recommendation.
 
Ann,
Thank you for the article, I have to wrap my head around how some treatments that our Vets have highly recommended for many years may actually be more dangerous than we thought or we told about.
So guess the search for a replacement begins as I have used Nexguard for years based on my Vets recommendation.

I used Nexguard too on my show dogs because it was hands down the most effective. Then about a year ago I read an article about research showing that the cumulative effect of the drug could impact the dog neurologically after years of use. That was enough for me to give it up and go back to Frontline. The most effective thing we do is have our yard sprayed by Tick Ranger four times a season with their cedar-based spray. I haven't seen a tick in three years.
 
Crapola. I have used Credelio with good success although neither Faith nor Meadow can now use it due to their seizures. Dang it. Frontline does nothing against fleas here, I don't know about ticks. You know, it shouldn't be surprising though, giving them essentially a poison for pest control would yield some problems.
 
Thanks for sharing this Ann, at least it gets the information out there for people to read and educate themselves. I seem to recall that this information has been out there for some time though but then I follow several different social media sites and it’s possible I’ve read this somewhere else previously.
I’ve just been seeing this all over Facebook recently and I feel like I’ve read this previously lol…as I get older I have to question whether my brain is playing tricks on me or not!:lol:
Last year when the dogs had fleas my vet was aware of the side effects of these flea and tick meds however I wonder if she would’ve told me about them if it weren’t for Blueberry’s issues? That’s part of the problem…the vet should be informing us of the dangers of giving this to our dogs…
 
Crapola. I have used Credelio with good success although neither Faith nor Meadow can now use it due to their seizures. Dang it. Frontline does nothing against fleas here, I don't know about ticks. You know, it shouldn't be surprising though, giving them essentially a poison for pest control would yield some problems.
Not surprising at all. I stopped giving Zulu flea and tick meds years ago. I have been fortunate, all these years never a flea or tick. I do check him every day. We are not in an area with a heavy tick population, but fleas are another issue. I have plant based natural spray on hand just in case.
 
I use nexguard on my dogs and have never been comfortable with a systemic treatment-- It does a great job on fleas and ticks and I do not use it during the winter months when basically there are no or very few ticks but still it worries me. I have used Frontline in the past but had one Sheltie who after each treatment was obviously very uncomfortable and would pace around for about half an hour. Also with such thick fur I was told it would not be as effective and to wit had found ticks embedded in the dog several times- around the head which was not far from where we had administered the FL. This was weeks after the FL was administered...so I went with a systemic with the current crew-- still what to do what to do??? No good or easy answer...
 
Are the rates eny different to the older meds? Australia is endemic with paralysis tick, although where I live the winters get cold enough that it keeps tick numbers down, but an hour's drive and there's ticks everywhere. Probably the risk of getting paralysis tick is higher than the risk of getting neurological events so what to use (and natural products make no difference to paralysis tick). I do try to avoid products with several uses or different chemicals, but many of them here are combination meds because it's just easier to people
 
Are the rates eny different to the older meds? Australia is endemic with paralysis tick, although where I live the winters get cold enough that it keeps tick numbers down, but an hour's drive and there's ticks everywhere. Probably the risk of getting paralysis tick is higher than the risk of getting neurological events so what to use (and natural products make no difference to paralysis tick). I do try to avoid products with several uses or different chemicals, but many of them here are combination meds because it's just easier to people

Yeah you have to weight the consequences when deciding to medicate and which to use. In severe tick environs I go with the strong stuff and hate that I have to but it beats the alternative. Both of us two leggers have had lymes disease or at least I was treated as a preventative and I know people who have had it bad and it was years before they fully recovered. In the case of the paralysis tick the choice would be clear for me...We apparently have that here in N America too tho not in large numbers??
 
Back
Top