HopeShelties
Forums Enthusiast
My Aurora is a sable from blue to sable and very dark, rich tri factored sable. My other is granddaughter of a sable merle. Bright, clear pumpkin orange. Lark's brother was a nice, clean blue merle and he was out of blue to sable. And I knew Duke, so can vouch for him being a nice, clean blue.
I think that whole bit about muddied colors is just a bunch of nonsense. There was a discussion about it on a facebook group recently. I was amazed by the number of long time breeders who believed that. It seemed those who bred strictly sables tended to believe it more often than those with aoacs.
IMO, degenerate, faded colors tend to produce more of the same. Clean, correct colors bred to others with clean correct color, whether it be sable x sable, tri/bi to sable, tri/bi to blue, blue to sable, or sable merle to any of those combinations, if using nicely colored dogs should produce nicely colored dogs. If a less desirable color (faded, rusty, muddied) pops up, it has something to do with the color genetics behind one, or both of the parents. Not anything to do with what two particular colors were bred together.
I think that whole bit about muddied colors is just a bunch of nonsense. There was a discussion about it on a facebook group recently. I was amazed by the number of long time breeders who believed that. It seemed those who bred strictly sables tended to believe it more often than those with aoacs.
IMO, degenerate, faded colors tend to produce more of the same. Clean, correct colors bred to others with clean correct color, whether it be sable x sable, tri/bi to sable, tri/bi to blue, blue to sable, or sable merle to any of those combinations, if using nicely colored dogs should produce nicely colored dogs. If a less desirable color (faded, rusty, muddied) pops up, it has something to do with the color genetics behind one, or both of the parents. Not anything to do with what two particular colors were bred together.