Sad Sheltie story...hope he makes it out

I agree that keeping Jack alive and getting him out is and should be the focus, both of our interest and this thread. It is not for us to question motives ... no one knows what goes on in someone else's life. Jack is the victim here.

Let's keep this thread and our attention on track, and do what we can to help Jack.
 
I agree that keeping Jack alive and getting him out is and should be the focus, both of our interest and this thread. It is not for us to question motives ... no one knows what goes on in someone else's life. Jack is the victim here.

Let's keep this thread and our attention on track, and do what we can to help Jack.

Well said, Ann.
 
Justice grinds very slowly

I have been able to track down the case inside the Oneida County Courts system; it is docketed as "Town of New Hartford v. Natalie Beratta," and has docket number 13-C-016. At this point, the attorney for "Jack" has filed his Appeal Brief, and the Town [Attorney Cully] has not filed his Reply Brief, although he was required to do so and is past the deadline. It looks like that Rule is not being enforced in that court, so when Mr. Cully gets around to filing his responsive Brief, then at that point the Clerk of Court will "calendar" a Hearing Date, and everybody gets to show up and argue Jack's fate.

In sum: looks like poor jack gets to spend another three weeks at least sitting in a jail cell. Just lovely.
 
...

In sum: looks like poor jack gets to spend another three weeks at least sitting in a jail cell. Just lovely.

Jan van Eck: Thank you for you update. I have enjoyed your comments about the case thus far, even though you and I differ a bit about some of the responsibilities of various parties. Clearly we both agree that poor Jack should be saved. It is doubtful that I will make further comments, however, since I have difficulty with being told what my "focus" should be on an issue (although I do not feel I have violated any TOS). Please continue your updates to keep us informed.
 
Update on Jack, still in jail

Well, folks, for the "good news," we are making some progress. The Court Hearing date is set for Friday, June 28, in the Oneida County Court House, located in downtown Utica, before Judge Dwyer. I have obtained the entire docket file and all the "Declarations" and now have reviewed everything except the photographs, which were not reproduced.

The Beratta family is represented by Louis DeSorbo, now of NYC, and formerly of Utica. The respondent, who is the individual animal control officer "Nicholas Morosco," is represented by Herb Cully, who finally wrote and filed a perfunctory Brief that in my view did not do much for his cause.

I did go to Utica and had a long meeting with the Mayor and his staff, who are all disgusted with New Hartford and their continuing to press the matter. Meanwhile, the pressure from Jack's supporters worldwide have had a serious effect on the legal system in Utica; everybody there is sick and tired of this case and wants it to go away. The District Attorney's office has been inundated with fax letters (they are not even a "party"!) and the legal system is looking for a "way out," although Cully for bizarre motives refuses to simply concede the matter.

In my own review of the docket, it occurred to me that the sequence of events works in Jack's favor. It turns out that Jack was brought by the Beratta's voluntarily to the Stevens-Swan Shelter - which is outside the town limits. The Animal-control officer [Morosco] did not even see Jack until he first met him at the Shelter - located in the City of Utica. Meanwhile, Herb Cully described the litigation as a "civil matter." However, as a civil matter, the New Hartford Court cannot assume jurisdiction over property located outside the Town at the time of the filing of the Complaint. As Jack was never actually inside New Hartford, the ability of the Officer to institute a "civil proceeding" against Jack evaporates.

I ran this by Jack's attorney who thought it was a novel idea and he will press that tack forward at the Hearing. It may provide just the excuse for the County Court to quash the Order. That would set Jack loose. Jack can never go back to New Hartford: those vindictive people in that Administration would be gunning for him, and under New York law any policeman can simply shoot any dog. You can bet that that would be the result.

Ironically, the Stevens-Swan Directors have stated that if the Berattas simply showed up, paid the bill, and took Jack out, nobody would attempt to stop them. All the Shelter would do was "inform" the New Hartford authorities, who have no jurisdiction anyway. The Berattas seem to be too frightened to do that, having been overwhelmed and intimidated by the forces arrayed against them.

I think the Berattas should collect Jack and move out of New Hartford. Why anyone would want to live in that mean-spirited town is beyond me. Lots of other nice suburbs around Utica.
 
I'm not sure if my opinions on this matter will be considered "off Focus" or not. To that end, I offer no opinion on this article (the most recent I've seen) about Jack the Sheltie, save this: The last paragraph of the article is interesting and a bit ominous depending on how you interpret it.

http://uticaod.com

Look in the column headed "Latest News". About 4 or 5 articles down is an update on Jack.
 
Today's Court Hearing

Today's bitterly contested court hearing, with Jack's supporters sitting in the front row of the Court Room, led to the Oneida County Judge, James Dwyer, asking the two attorney teams for "alternatives to a death sentence" for Jack. The Ruling is set over for two weeks, after which the Court will review the options submitted and make a decision. However, as with any Court Ruling, it is subject to Appeal to the next court up the chain, by either party.

I conclude that what this judge is attempting to do is forge a consensus disposition, so that a "stipulation" can be entered into the Record, and thus put an end to the litigation. Since it is unlikely that the Beratta family is going to stipulate to having their Jack murdered, in reality it means that the Town of New Hartford is finally going to have to bend and agree to some other, presumably face-saving, resolution. Everybody involved knows that Jack's supporters will again Appeal any decision that goes against Jack. So the court looks to find a solution, anything to close out this case. Well, you folks can always write strident letters to the Town Supervisor of New Hartford. He controls the final deal; he is the man that has to give up.
 
Back
Top