Now that I am home on a REAL computer . . . realize I don't trust AR extremists, or the legal system, or the media. However, what I do trust is the words directly from the volunteers who had hands on with the animals.
The news reports went from -- good shape -- to heavily relying on dental issues as reason for charging -- to now much health and husbandry issues that were appalling. I didn't want to see this person crucified without good reason. I didn't want the legal system or the AR extremists to trump up charges by grasping for whatever they could as a reason. I didn't want to jump to conclusions myself without hearing facts either. If the animals are indeed in such bad shape as this, then yes, charge with the kind of cruelty that is based in neglect -- if there is a way to differentiate from dog fighting, beating, lighting on fire kind of cruelty.
I don't in any way mean to say sweep it under the rug or turn a blind eye because of her personal problems. We have a responsibility as stewards of the animals in our care and she needs to be held accountable for her failings of that. Since there has been a long history with animal authorities with this person, that does make things worse. I haven't seen any other stories on this incident from other news sources and hearing further facts from additional links on this thread, of course there should be charges for cruelty based in neglect rather than cruelty based in out and out violence. I am so sorry for these dogs and I hope they all find homes to give them love and freedom and good care. I hope this person does not take on animals ever again, knowing she is unable to care for them properly. This is more extreme but like my Melli, a puppy mill discarded breeder, groomed and cleaned up inside and out by rescue, and given a home for the rest of her life where she is thriving and loved and pampered. I hope these 61 have justice and love.