I don't agree that it's a sport so too bad if it's not safe. It's an activity that people do with their dogs - the
majority do it for fun, not to see their dog injured. How is having an unsafe piece of equipment
showing a dog's agility, it isn't. Let the people who are willing to risk their dogs create a seperate sport. And I will point out that in
human sports the rules and equipment are always being reviewed and changed for safety reasons. And if you don't think it's unsafe - just read all the discussions on dog injuries in Clean Run.
There was a major safety review of equipment here and many changes introed last year. As we run outside we probably see more injuries (no soft landings here).
They do not allow the tyre jump, for instance, at any competition as they believe it a high injury risk.
Tyre jumps can be dangerous. And do they really show any agility to do? We use the breakaway tyres here. There is probably a reason BAA didn't go for them - cost maybe?
Then I saw they are banning the chute tunnel from competitions, again saying they cause too many injuries.
I hate the chute. Sick of seeing small dogs twisting around in them stuck, including my Tully. I've been DQ'd a couple of times by releasing her from the chute. It's not the bottom but the loose fabric on the top that's a problem. Even pegging the ends down the dogs get caught. Our chutes were also shortened in the review (2m) and the front end is flexible rather than hard (still hate it tho).
Despite all the whinging when the changes were made here, it was hardly a hiccup in the running of courses. The best change was the reduction in the seesaw (people called it the weesaw), but the reduction in injuries and problems was so immense that people's views changed.