...So there is once case that I know of where a dilute black dog (without tan, if I remember) was registered and finished it's championship. It was probably registered as a bi-black, and the judges chose to award it points without regard to the color fault. AKC doesn't check color registrations, and the competition is based on the judges knowledge of the standard.
Thank you for that follow up. The picture is coming clearer for me. There are two things that surfaced in this thread that I find important. One (at least in my interpretation of the events) is that many of us are a bit cavalier with the words we toss around (which isn't a problem if the knowledge and skill level of all is equal). If you say to me, "blues aren't real", I read "blues aren't real." What is really being said is, "blue like in this or that breed aren't real (in Shelties) but Sheltie blues are OK". When you toss in the fact that Sheltie Blues aren't really blue anyway, the confusion generated by this type of conversation is magnified for us newbies.
Two. Your reference to the AKC solidifies in my mind (which is admittedly biased on my part) that whatever they have been in the past, the primary goal of the AKC now is to grow the AKC, not primarily the betterment of dog stuff. As an aside, I was recently engaged in a 21 day conversation with the AKC that was totally inane and fruitless. For those "Seinfeld" fans in the audience you will understand the reference when I say that it was a 21 day conversation "about nothing". Anyway, your response helped clear things up a bit.
