danisgoat
Moderator
In your experience, do you think the dogs that were there to see their friend go, mourned less? Or do you think the mourning was somehow easier on them because they experienced the death and knew they were "gone" to a point? I don't mean that literally. And that the ones they weren't there for, was mourned harder in a sense? Does that make any sense?
In my experience, the best way I can describe this situation is that there is a "peace" about it. The dogs know what happened. They are not looking for their friend everytime the back door opens. They are not checking in the empty crate, going to the dogs favorite spot under a chair.
The hardest loss we had was our Glori (Irish Setter). She was 9 years old at the time. Glori ate some poisonous mushrooms in the yard and died within 12 hours from showing signs of illness (we did not see her get the mushrooms) at the vet's office. It was HORRIBLE. My Cedar (her brother) aged about 5 years after that. Within four months (he was 8 years old) his face went from red to gray. He looked for her for about 6 months. It took that long for him to forget her. He did not know what happened and he missed his best friend/sister. It was devastating for all of us.
If I have another dog die at the vets office, I will without a doubt, as hard as it will be, bring the dog home for the other one to smell. I will never go through that mourning process as I did with Cedar.
Everytime we had a dog put down at home, the dogs never "looked" for their buddy. This isn't something I am humanizing or creating. It just is what it is. They know.
Last edited: