take4roll10
Moderator
Personally, I think the rule is fine. Why? Because I'm responsible for my dog's safety and that means I should pay attention to the equipment. I don't think it should be re-run because it's not an equipment failure, if you will. I may not like all the rules, but this one, I dunno, it kinda puts the responsibility on you, the owner. We do have to take some responsibility for our dog's safety in regards to the equipment.
But you can check the equipment while you're doing a walk-thru, which is what I do. Let 's say the bars aren't set during your walk-thru yet, or you're in open or novice (where all heights run in the same class, so the jump heights are changed in the middle of runs) or a bar is knocked by the dog before your run and the ring crew puts it back at the wrong height, how are you supposed to check every jump when you're not in the ring? You should get an NQ because the ring crew messed up one jump? The judge wants you in the ring before the previous dog even crosses the last obstacle. How can you possibly inspect everything? IMO it's ridiculous to make the exhibitor responsible for making sure every equipment is the correct height before your run. Why am I even paying $15-$25 a run? Let me walk around the course right before my run and inspect all the equipment and bar heights, then I'll be ok with being responsible.