I mainly compete in AKC and that is my preferred venue. It's just what I've done for so long
NADAC is just too odd for me. So few people, yet so many different kinds of runs and what exactly does a hoopers course show in the way of skill? In the standard runs they don't have a teeter or table and then they put rubber all over the obstacles they do have. I get being safe but it's a bit overboard in my opinion. The only thing I like about NADAC is the ability to run the standard course over again, but in the opposite direction.
USDAA I do like because even though I'm just starting out in it, I can still compete in the Grand Prix and Steeplechase and qualify for regional and national competition without investing years of qualifying since we're already competing at the excellent B level in AKC.
When my 10 year old daughter starts out, she's going to do a USDAA show first because she can do jumpers without having to stress out over the weaves. I plan on entering her in jumpers and gamblers.
As for CPE, I've never done it but it seems great for beginners.
NADAC is just too odd for me. So few people, yet so many different kinds of runs and what exactly does a hoopers course show in the way of skill? In the standard runs they don't have a teeter or table and then they put rubber all over the obstacles they do have. I get being safe but it's a bit overboard in my opinion. The only thing I like about NADAC is the ability to run the standard course over again, but in the opposite direction.
USDAA I do like because even though I'm just starting out in it, I can still compete in the Grand Prix and Steeplechase and qualify for regional and national competition without investing years of qualifying since we're already competing at the excellent B level in AKC.
When my 10 year old daughter starts out, she's going to do a USDAA show first because she can do jumpers without having to stress out over the weaves. I plan on entering her in jumpers and gamblers.
As for CPE, I've never done it but it seems great for beginners.