Dismiss Notice
Hello Guest, Welcome to the new version of Sheltieforums.com. If you have any questions regarding the new software, please post in the following section: Forum Upgrade

Size Disadvantage?

Discussion in 'The Sheltie Standard' started by SheltieChe, Jan 7, 2011.

  1. ClantyreSheltie

    ClantyreSheltie Forums Sage

    2,876
    20
    130
    Feb 24, 2010
    Baltimore
    That is a good idea in theory, but it's not realistic. The sire of my first two litters is 16 1/2 inches tall. Here is the breakdown in size he has produced:

    Bred to Desi (15 inches):
    Savvy: 13"
    Evie: 14 1/2"
    MJ: 16 1/2"

    Bred to Liesl (16 inches):
    Little Jo: 14 1/2"
    Skye: 15"
    Terree: 15 1/2" (last I knew, I need to get her measured)
    Beth: 17"

    So out of seven puppies five are well in size, with three of those being on the small end. Size is such a variable, we can't just throw out the oversized ones, especially when they have other virtues that we want to keep.

    Marques sire is 14 1/2" tall, his dam in 15" tall. His g-dam is 13" on her tippy toes. Welcome to Shelties. :smile2:
     
  2. danisgoat

    danisgoat Moderator

    7,388
    849
    260
    Jul 23, 2009
    NJ
    Do you think it is unpredictable because breeders use dogs that are not within the size standard or dogs that are very near the uppler or lower limits of the standard for their breeding program?

    So the genes of the taller and/or smaller dogs are in the background of the pups?


    Most definitely. I couldn't agree with you more.
     
  3. JessicaR

    JessicaR Forums Enthusiast

    1,216
    1
    95
    Sep 8, 2008
    Tiffin Ohio
    size is definitly unpredictable.

    My male Dusty is 17.25 inches his dad was barely 13 in, mom was 14 in. All grandparents were insize 14-15 in. The rest of the pups in the litter were in size. It goes to show you can breed size dogs and still get an oversized dog
     
  4. Lightplum

    Lightplum Forums Sage

    3,074
    6
    130
    Jan 4, 2009
    Rhode Island
    NO I think that because of the out-crosses with most recently collies you are still seeing the size variations popping up. The smaller sizes I believe are coming from before the collie crosses as if you look at the past standards even going back to the UK the original standard size was 13" nothing above. which as we all know is small!

    But there are some breeders who are getting better on size with tight line-breeding its giving more predictable results. However there are still the oddball sizes that just pop up!
     
  5. danisgoat

    danisgoat Moderator

    7,388
    849
    260
    Jul 23, 2009
    NJ
    Do you all think that Sheltie breeders commonly have a problem with size because the breed is newer than other breeds and the breed was developed by using larger dogs (ie. collie)? At least in the US. That is why the US Shelties tend to have a problem with being oversized versus the European Shelties? Those collie genes just keep popping back up in the pups from US Shelties?
     
  6. tofu pup

    tofu pup Moderator

    1,739
    401
    130
    Aug 28, 2009
    Brooklyn, NY
    This is the impression that I'm under. My sense is that there's a lot of variation in the breed, and not just in size - you can have a litter with tiny, Pomeranian-faced pets and hulking, heavy-skulled pets. All-Champion litters in Shelties are a very big achievement.

    On the other hand, our friends in Collies (an older breed, a tighter, smaller gene-pool) have very predictable litters: they can breed this dog to that bitch and guess pretty well that they'll end up with - and be right! It's much more "doable" to finish a whole litter, or at least many in the litter, in Collies.
     
  7. danisgoat

    danisgoat Moderator

    7,388
    849
    260
    Jul 23, 2009
    NJ
    This is all very intersting to me, as you know I grew up with my mom being an Irish Setter breeder.

    My mom's last litter of Irish Setters, the sire and dam were both champions and then all three of my mom's puppies (two dogs and one bitch) are now champions. So my mom's last litter, all were finished. This was kind of just expected to happen. It is interesting to me on how much variation Shelties get within each litter, where as with the Setters, there isn't much variation between littermates at all.

    Thanks for having this discussion everyone....I am enjoying it :wink2:
     
  8. HopeShelties

    HopeShelties Forums Enthusiast

    1,945
    1
    85
    Dec 2, 2008
    Kentucky
    I wouldn't say a smaller one that's at the lower end of the size chart, while still being in size shouldn't be bred. The two girls I have used for breeding thus far were 13.25" and 13.75" respectively. The first girl produced 4 pups the first time, and 2 the second. The second girl produced 6 pups both times. Neither had a bit of trouble delivering due to size. I think it's much riskier to have a singleton in a bitch of ANY size versus a regular litter for any, even smaller, in size sheltie.
     
  9. Chris

    Chris Premium Member

    10,901
    10,487
    885
    Feb 25, 2008
    That's what makes Shelties so much fun--it's a crap shoot!! :lol:
     
  10. tofu pup

    tofu pup Moderator

    1,739
    401
    130
    Aug 28, 2009
    Brooklyn, NY
    ...I'm not sure "fun" is the word I would choose. :lol:
     

Share This Page