Will boycott this film! A dog's purpose

I read the book. I loved the book! But as soon as I heard they were making a movie, I thought it was a bad idea. Not all great books translate to a great movie. And I felt the way to book was written in the voice of the dog would make for a cheesy movie.

As for the clip, well I work in the entertainment field so I've been very torn. I see both sides and feel similar to SKNressia.
 
I don't read sad dog books or go to sad dog movies. There's enough sorrow in the world.

This is where I stand. I don't know about the alleged abuse, and I don't know if you could say I'm boycotting the movie. But I'm not going to see it because there's enough to cry about in the world (especially now) that I don't need to see any sad dog movies.
 
So has anyone read the book that the movie is based on?

I haven't read the book, but am listening to it via Audible right now--and I REALLY love the book so far (about half-way through).

I went and saw the film over the weekend. As pet-parent who is passionate about my dogs, I cannot over-emphasize how beautiful this film was. My husband, son, and daughter-in-law (all of whom own dogs) cried tears of emotion throughout the ENTIRE film. Not tears of sadness, per se---just tears of empathy, of joy, of understanding the profound bond that the people in the film shared with their dog(s)--ultimately, a single soul threaded through several of the owners' lives. It is IMPOSSIBLE for me to believe that the people who made this film are not just as passionate as I am about my furry companions... It even shows a heartbreaking plight of dogs who are abused and neglected by their owners as a strict condemnation of how cruel people can be, while also showing the profound willingness our dogs show to forgive and forget how stupid people can be.

Despite all the tears, however, this is NOT "a sad dog film." At the end of the film, there is just pure joy. The film was inspiring, uplifting, and made us all go home and hug our dogs even a bit tighter and appreciate all they give to us a bit more. We all left the theater with HUGE smiles on our faces, even as our cheeks were wet. I immediately posted on FB letting all my friends know how beautiful the film and it's message is. I don't believe I've ever seen a film more touching about the relationship we share and the richness we receive from our canine companions (and I'm even including 'Marley and Me'!). I would recommend it to anyone... but take either a box of Kleenex, or perhaps save the environment and just take a towel. ;)

By the way, as a bit of (potential) closure, for those that may be concerned: just as the initial trailers showed from the very beginning (before the controversy even broke), the scene of the German Shepherd leaping into the water was all done in CGI. As the filmmakers reported, when the dog didn't want to jump in at the time of the shoot, they chose to CGI it, anyway. While the scene follows on later to show the dog in the water with another actor, they filmmakers lived up to their word when they said they chose not to force the dog to jump in against his will for the sake of the shot.
 
Looks like fake news is not limited to politics. "The American Humane Organization says a third-party investigation prompted by a leaked video from the set of "A Dogs Purpose" found no animal injuries occurred during those scenes. The investigation followed release of the video that appeared to show a frightened German Shepard being forced into churning water. American Humane said Friday an independent anti-animal cruelty expert concluded that preventative safety measures were in place. The group also said that leaked video was deliberately edited to mislead the public."
 
My husband, son, and daughter-in-law (all of whom own dogs) cried tears of emotion throughout the ENTIRE film. Not tears of sadness, per se---just tears of empathy, of joy, of understanding the profound bond that the people in the film shared with their dog(s)--ultimately, a single soul threaded through several of the owners' lives.

That's why I won't be going - don't like to cry for whatever reason. My sister told me the story line and while it sounds lovely, it's way too sad for me.

I saw the press release about the virul video being heavily doctored. There was mention of an organisation wanting to stop animals not just in movies but as pets. So seems there was an ulterior motive.
 
Looks like fake news is not limited to politics. "The American Humane Organization says a third-party investigation prompted by a leaked video from the set of "A Dogs Purpose" found no animal injuries occurred during those scenes. The investigation followed release of the video that appeared to show a frightened German Shepard being forced into churning water. American Humane said Friday an independent anti-animal cruelty expert concluded that preventative safety measures were in place. The group also said that leaked video was deliberately edited to mislead the public."

Thanks for sharing this, RikyR... I was SO glad to read that the third-party, independent investigation's findings were that no abuse occurred on set...

Here's the article:

'A Dog's Purpose' video found misleading by independent investigation
A+Dogs+purpose.jpg

By AP |
Posted: Sun 1:26 PM, Feb 05, 2017

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Leaked video showing a frightened dog being forced into churning water during filming of "A Dog's Purpose" was misleadingly edited and the German shepherd was unharmed, according to third-party findings released by American Humane, the group responsible for overseeing animal safety on the movie set.

An independent animal-cruelty expert found that preventative safety measures were in place to protect the dog, Hercules, American Humane said. The board-certified veterinarian, who was not identified, concluded that the dog was momentarily stressed but suffered no lasting ill effects.

The group said the outside expert, whose name was withheld because of the public outcry following the video's release, found it to be a misrepresentation of events.

"The decisions by the individual or individuals who captured and deliberately edited the footage, and then waited longer than 15 months to release the manipulated video only days before the movie's premiere, raise serious questions about their motives and ethics," American Humane said Friday.

"The video was deliberately edited for the purpose of misleading the public and stoking outrage. In fact, the two scenes shown in the edited video were filmed at different times," the group said in reporting the findings.

That conclusion was based on viewing unedited footage from the set and on eyewitness accounts, group spokesman Mark Stubis said Saturday. Who may have leaked the video wasn't addressed in the report, and American Humane doesn't know who is responsible, he said.

The video had an immediate impact on "A Dog's Purpose," starring Dennis Quaid and featuring Josh Gads' voice, as a planned press day and starry premiere were canceled. But producer Amblin Entertainment and distributor Universal Pictures stuck to plans to release the PG-rated film a week ago in more than 3,000 North American theaters.

Despite the controversy, the feel-good film that had been pegged to open in the mid-$20-million range still managed to earn an estimated $18.4 million and place second at the box office, behind "Split." Studio representatives said that was in line with their hopes.

Amblin Entertainment and Universal Pictures declined comment on the report Saturday.

American Humane, which had an animal safety representative on the set, acknowledged that "the handling of the dog in the first scene in the video should have been gentler and signs of stress recognized earlier."

"That being said, it is important to note that this was recognized and the scene did not proceed as insinuated by the misleadingly edited video," the group added. The dog was immediately taken to a warming tent, an examination found no signs of stress, and the dog later was returned to filming, it said.

The on-set representative, who American Humane said was joined by three trainers, a safety coordinator and a water safety diver throughout the scene, was suspended after the video's release. The group declined to address the person's status, citing confidentiality for personnel issues.

Looks like fake news is not limited to politics. "The American Humane Organization says a third-party investigation prompted by a leaked video from the set of "A Dogs Purpose" found no animal injuries occurred during those scenes. The investigation followed release of the video that appeared to show a frightened German Shepard being forced into churning water. American Humane said Friday an independent anti-animal cruelty expert concluded that preventative safety measures were in place. The group also said that leaked video was deliberately edited to mislead the public."
, senior vice president for the animal rights group PETA, called the report's findings incomplete and said the video still shows "a frightened dog who did not wish to go into the water."

"The fact that the dog did not get injured or die is not at issue, but questions remain," including why the dog was checked at the time, Lange said in a statement. "In the making of a film, no animal should be frightened at all. It is a film."

Dr. Kwane Stewart, the veterinarian in charge of American Humane's "No Animals Were Harmed" program based on filming guidelines developed by a scientific advisory committee, said in a statement that the organization is "the first to address fight cruelty and abuse" and that none occurred on the movie set.

American Humane is the sole industry-sanctioned animal safety group on film and TV production sets.

What does everyone think....?

How do you feel about PETA's senior VP's comments that "no animal should be frightened at all" during the process of training and learning new skills? Is any or all potential fear that is being felt by a dog being trained new things or exposed to new environments automatically abuse or something that should be completely eliminated...?

I wonder how any parent--human or canine--can teach their offspring, or how any offspring--human or canine--can learn specific skills or knowledge without involving some risk, and even potentially feeling some fleeting fear... And in my mind, facing fear certainly isn't abuse, especially when the fear itself is misguided fear or fear of something that won't really hurt us. I remember my own parents teaching me to swim, despite crippling fear of the water, including their hauling me--a wailing, screaming youngster--into the water, completely against my will. Once I was in the water, though, I grew to LOVE water, and remain an avid swimmer, today--as are my own three kids, who I, in turn, taught to face their own similar childish fears of water.

Perhaps, when learning to face our own momentary, fleeting, and unfounded fears, it's best to remember those wise words that, "The only thing we have to fear is fear itself"....

In my view, PeTA hijacked the altered video footage and helped propel the hype of this "fake news" story to serve their own ant-pet ends. While I agree with and share many of PeTA's values and goals of eliminating suffering and abusive practices towards the animals with whom we share this planet, I don't agree with or support many of their policies and beliefs about pets. Despite the fact that PeTA's website asserts: "Contrary to myth, PETA does not want to confiscate animals who are well cared for and “set them free," their site also says,

"We at PETA very much love the animal companions who share our homes, but we believe that it would have been in the animals’ best interests if the institution of “pet keeping”—i.e., breeding animals to be kept and regarded as “pets”—never existed. The international pastime of domesticating animals has created an overpopulation crisis; as a result, millions of unwanted animals are destroyed every year as “surplus.”

"This selfish desire to possess animals and receive love from them causes immeasurable suffering, which results from manipulating their breeding, selling or giving them away casually, and depriving them of the opportunity to engage in their natural behavior. They are restricted to human homes, where they must obey commands and can only eat, drink, and even urinate when humans allow them to...

"What we want is for the population of dogs and cats to be reduced through spaying and neutering and for people to adopt animals (preferably two so that they can keep each other company when their human companions aren’t home) from pounds or animal shelters—never from pet shops or breeders—thereby reducing suffering in the world."​

Most of that reflects attitudes and beliefs that are not something I share or agree with.
 
Last edited:
How do you feel about PETA's senior VP's comments that "no animal should be frightened at all" during the process of training and learning new skills? Is any or all potential fear that is being felt by a dog being trained new things or exposed to new environments automatically abuse or something that should be completely eliminated...?

That's like not teaching my kids to ride a bike or learn how to rollerskate because they are scared of falling. Ridiculous... Cleo my oldest sheltie was afraid of the Teeter when I first introduced her to that. Now she loves going over it and all of the agility equipment we have. Like I said I think it's ridiculous.
 
I can't get into the media release anymore (I'm guessing the website can't handle the traffic), but I think it was another, similar to, but not PETA, that the Humane Society made a veiled comment on who was behind it.

I don't know if Variety is a respected rag or not, but I found this article on the film by American Humane CEO really interesting. http://variety.com/2017/film/news/a...can-humane-response-robin-ganzert-1201969941/. Gives an interesting view of PETA - can't believe how many pets they've killed at their shelter.
 
Last edited:
I can't get into the media release anymore (I'm guessing the website can't handle the traffic), but I think it was another, similar to, but not PETA, that the Humane Society made a veiled comment on who was behind it.

I don't know if Variety is a respected rag or not, but I found this article on the film by American Humane CEO really interesting. http://variety.com/2017/film/news/a...can-humane-response-robin-ganzert-1201969941/. Gives an interesting view of PETA - can't believe how many pets they've killed at their shelter.

I hadn't read The American Human Society's response... as beautiful as it was insightful, in my view.

At the risk of beating a dead horse, I wanted to share another video response which came across my newsfeed this morning, which added a few additional details and a timely call for being cautious of "fake news," especially in an age of "click-bait-y" headlines towards which we're already pre-disposed to WANT to believe, due to our already-existing values (in this case, a desire to promote animal welfare and discourage mistreatment and abuse). Here's the link--it's really just the first four minutes, which focus entirely on the "Dog's Purpose" controversy, despite the screen shot of all the other topics in the video player below (I didn't bother watching the rest--it looks like it got political, and I don't want to even go there on this site!!! ;) ):


What I find fascinating, and somewhat disheartening, is that to me, it seems clear now that hundreds of people worked hard on a film in which animals were treated with incredible care, and even ceased filming, despite the dog's desire to rush back in the water, out of "an abundance of care," according to all reports... and yet, one 60 second video edited with a sensational headline by an organization with an anti-pet agenda manipulated peoples' emotions and destroyed thousands of people's impressions of and confidence in a beautiful film promoting dogs and their positive influence in our lives... That astonishes and scares me. That is the age of social media which we live, and my hope is that we learn from jumping to conclusions based on sensational reports.

Oh... and go see this film!!! It's inspiring and uplifting. As I told my friends and family, despite emerging from the theater with wet cheeks, you will also come out with a huge smile and a warmed heart!!!
 
Last edited:
Back
Top