It IS a fine distinction. However, I don't see this 92-year-old woman in exactly the same circle of Hell as a pro football player dog fighter, people who light pets on fire for kicks, and people claiming to be a rescue but tying them to trees without food or water til they die and lay there til the vultures come.
I think it is like the TV program "Most Evil". There's levels. Not saying any of the levels are blameless or should be given a free pass, but some clearly are more psychopathic than others and that should be reflected in the legal charges and the public statements about the person.
A friends' great grandson was not tended well on a daily basis (not a one time thing I am saying), the toddler was always left to play alone in the yard and on occasion he would wander off to be returned by a neighbor. One day he fell in their unfenced pool and drowned. They knew they didn't watch well, they knew they should have done better, they were still quite heartbroken. Is that the same as the people I typed about at the Children's Hospital Neurology ward who abused and killed their child by slamming his head against a wall out of revenge on the spouse or smashing his head with an object because he cried? Is that the same as someone who kidnaps a child and tortures her and murders her? No. None of them are blameless, they are not charged the same in court, they are not spoken about the same in the media.
That's all. There's differences. It's still wrong, but there's discrete differences and I would like to see the story accurately reported and the charges accurately reflecting the intent and the results.
I think it is like the TV program "Most Evil". There's levels. Not saying any of the levels are blameless or should be given a free pass, but some clearly are more psychopathic than others and that should be reflected in the legal charges and the public statements about the person.
A friends' great grandson was not tended well on a daily basis (not a one time thing I am saying), the toddler was always left to play alone in the yard and on occasion he would wander off to be returned by a neighbor. One day he fell in their unfenced pool and drowned. They knew they didn't watch well, they knew they should have done better, they were still quite heartbroken. Is that the same as the people I typed about at the Children's Hospital Neurology ward who abused and killed their child by slamming his head against a wall out of revenge on the spouse or smashing his head with an object because he cried? Is that the same as someone who kidnaps a child and tortures her and murders her? No. None of them are blameless, they are not charged the same in court, they are not spoken about the same in the media.
That's all. There's differences. It's still wrong, but there's discrete differences and I would like to see the story accurately reported and the charges accurately reflecting the intent and the results.
